ATI DX10 R600 Pictures Have Been Leaked

Post by **Apoptosis** » Fri Apr 13, 2007 10:11 am

mongol05 wrote:This would definately not pull me away from nVidia. It looks too... complicated.

nah... It's got a PCIe slot and two power headers on it... no tougher than the 8800GTX!

werty316 · Post by **werty316** » Fri Apr 13, 2007 10:42 am

nVidia is gonna crap themselves when the R600 is out and about

jazkat wrote:
dkarko wrote:What a monster! Do you know if they planning on a mid budget solution in 2007? I don't even think this card fits in my case
ati/amd releases r600 details (mmmm specs)

the 12.5 inch is the oem for vendors the retail r600 will be about 9.5
(thats an inch or 2 shorter than the 8800gtx)

At the top of the DirectX 10 chain, is the ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT. The AMD ATI Radeon HD 2900-series features 320 stream processors, over twice as many as NVIDIAâ€™s GeForce 8800 GTX. AMD couples the 320 stream processors with a 512-bit memory interface with eight channels. CrossFire support is now natively supported by the AMD ATI Radeon HD 2900-series; the external CrossFire dongle is a thing of the past.

The R600-based ATI Radeon HD 2900-series products also support 128-bit HDR rendering. AMD has also upped the ante on anti-aliasing support. The ATI Radeon HD 2900-series supports up to 24x anti-aliasing. NVIDIAâ€™s GeForce 8800-series only supports up to 16x anti-aliasing. AMDâ€™s ATI Radeon HD 2900-series also possesses physics processing

AMDâ€™s RV630-based products will carry the ATI Radeon HD 2600 moniker with Pro and XT models. The value-targeted RV610-based products will carry the ATI Radeon HD 2400 name with Pro and XT models as well

wow what a monster card ,now they are tinkering away with the R650 and next year we will see the all amd r700

Posted here for those who care: http://forums.legitreviews.com/viewtopic.php?t=9306

dkarko · Post by **dkarko** » Fri Apr 13, 2007 11:35 am

Interesting, thanks. I will wait till all of them come out then and be able to compare them with nvidia both on performance and price.
Till then gma X3000 hell for me.

Post by **Apoptosis** » Fri Apr 13, 2007 12:02 pm

dkarko wrote:Interesting, thanks. I will wait till all of them come out then and be able to compare them with nvidia both on performance and price.
Till then gma X3000 hell for me.

The dropped the X... is HD now... So this is the HD 2900 XT or something like that.

werty316 · Post by **werty316** » Fri Apr 13, 2007 5:02 pm

Ah I can see some more confusion in the future ah...

Post by **Apoptosis** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 4:17 pm

AMD has named the rest of its upcoming ATI Radeon DirectX 10 product lineup. The new DirectX 10 product family received the ATI Radeon HD 2000-series moniker. For the new product generation, AMD has tagged HD to the product name to designate the entire lineupâ€™s Avivo HD technology. AMD has also removed the X-prefix on its product models.

At the top of the DirectX 10 chain, is the ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT. The AMD ATI Radeon HD 2900-series features 320 stream processors, over twice as many as NVIDIAâ€™s GeForce 8800 GTX. AMD couples the 320 stream processors with a 512-bit memory interface with eight channels. CrossFire support is now natively supported by the AMD ATI Radeon HD 2900-series; the external CrossFire dongle is a thing of the past.

The R600-based ATI Radeon HD 2900-series products also support 128-bit HDR rendering. AMD has also upped the ante on anti-aliasing support. The ATI Radeon HD 2900-series supports up to 24x anti-aliasing. NVIDIAâ€™s GeForce 8800-series only supports up to 16x anti-aliasing. AMDâ€™s ATI Radeon HD 2900-series also possesses physics processing.

New to the ATI Radeon HD 2900-series are integrated HDMI output capabilities with 5.1 surround sound. However, early images of AMDâ€™s OEM R600 reveal dual dual-link DVI outputs, rendering the audio functions useless.

AMDâ€™s RV630-based products will carry the ATI Radeon HD 2600 moniker with Pro and XT models. The value-targeted RV610-based products will carry the ATI Radeon HD 2400 name with Pro and XT models as well.

The entire AMD ATI Radeon HD 2000-family features the latest Avivo HD technology. AMDâ€™s upgraded Avivo with a new Universal Video Decoder, also known as UVD, and the new Advanced Video Processor, or AVP. UVD previously made its debut in the OEM-exclusive RV550 GPU core. UVD provides hardware acceleration of H.264 and VC-1 high definition video formats used by Blu-ray and HD DVD. The AVP allows the GPU to apply hardware acceleration and video processing functions while keeping power consumption low.

Expect AMD to launch the ATI Radeon HD 2000-family in the upcoming weeks, if AMD doesnâ€™t push back the launch dates further.

dgood · Post by **dgood** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 4:21 pm

can't wait to see some legit benchmarks of these things.

werty316 · Post by **werty316** » Sat Apr 14, 2007 4:48 pm

dgood wrote:can't wait to see some legit benchmarks of these things.

But for now:

http://www.vr-zone.com/?i=4898
http://www.bilgiustam.com/?p=125

Post by **Apoptosis** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 10:47 am

Wonder if the demo is DX10 or DX9

elkmanwsu · Post by **elkmanwsu** » Mon Apr 16, 2007 4:10 pm

Dang. I'm not a fanboy of either company but I was hoping to see some better results from this badboy. This thing is not only long...maybe too long, but it seems that all the sources I've seen says it also draws a ton of power. This card is coming out so late in the game (just like AMDs quad-core) that nVidia will probably release their 9000 series GPUs and blow it out of the water. oh well. There is always the next generation...or maybe its too early to tell.

HONkUS · Post by **HONkUS** » Mon Apr 16, 2007 5:54 pm

its tough to compare the NV/AMD race to the Intel/AMD race.

Development times for graphics chips are alot shorter then with CPU's

Just think about how many CPU's you've been through in the last 5 years versus how many graphics cards.

Here's the last 5 or so years for me:

CPU's:
Socket 754 Athlon 64 3200+
Socket AM2 Athlon X2 4200+

GFX Cards:
GeForce 5200 AGP
GeForce 6800GT AGP
GeForce 7600GT PCI-E
GeForce 7800GT PCI-E
GeForce 8800GTS 640mb PCI-E

See what I mean.

AMD might be a little behind in the CPU arena but not nearly as far behind as they are in the GFX Chip Arena.

jazkat · Post by **jazkat** » Tue Apr 24, 2007 12:05 pm

HONkUS wrote:its tough to compare the NV/AMD race to the Intel/AMD race.

Development times for graphics chips are alot shorter then with CPU's

Just think about how many CPU's you've been through in the last 5 years versus how many graphics cards.

Here's the last 5 or so years for me:

CPU's:
Socket 754 Athlon 64 3200+
Socket AM2 Athlon X2 4200+

GFX Cards:
GeForce 5200 AGP
GeForce 6800GT AGP
GeForce 7600GT PCI-E
GeForce 7800GT PCI-E
GeForce 8800GTS 640mb PCI-E

See what I mean.

AMD might be a little behind in the CPU arena but not nearly as far behind as they are in the GFX Chip Arena.

ill think ull find if u do a search today on the k10 chip that trounces intels fastest chip upto 66%

and the ati card is trouncing nvidia's 8800gts they will be here in may if they got these out last year when they were supposed to nvidia would have been way behind

jazkat · Post by **jazkat** » Tue Apr 24, 2007 12:08 pm

Apoptosis wrote:

Wonder if the demo is DX10 or DX9

oh and that is fake also

dgood · Post by **dgood** » Tue Apr 24, 2007 12:24 pm

HONkUS wrote:its tough to compare the NV/AMD race to the Intel/AMD race.

Development times for graphics chips are alot shorter then with CPU's

Just think about how many CPU's you've been through in the last 5 years versus how many graphics cards.

Here's the last 5 or so years for me:

CPU's:
Socket 754 Athlon 64 3200+
Socket AM2 Athlon X2 4200+

GFX Cards:
GeForce 5200 AGP
GeForce 6800GT AGP
GeForce 7600GT PCI-E
GeForce 7800GT PCI-E
GeForce 8800GTS 640mb PCI-E

See what I mean.

AMD might be a little behind in the CPU arena but not nearly as far behind as they are in the GFX Chip Arena.

NO joke, I went from athlon xp 2200+ to amd 64 4000+ to Fx-60.
Went from Radeon 8500 to a 9600 to a x800 to a x1800xt. But that is in like 3 or 4 years. I had a 3800x2 and x1600xt also, but not on my primary rig.

The results are pretty close. I can't wait to see some really good dx10 benchmarks. I want to see what it really has to offer. Also These cards have to really be a big improvement to make people jump ship and fork over that much money.

Kalko · Post by **Kalko** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 5:27 am

Ati Radeon 2900XT review: http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=7043

Post by **Apoptosis** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 9:17 am

What do you guys think about the fact that ATI doesn't have a high end offering?

Bio-Hazard · Post by **Bio-Hazard** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 9:29 am

Have to wait and see what the real story is when the cards are released to the real world.............

dkarko · Post by **dkarko** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 1:10 pm

So.. are they launching or what?

. Weren't they supposed to release them in Tunisia a couple of days ago? (I'm kinda confused here hehehe).
I thought i could wait longer but this g965 crawls/sec of intel's is making me go nuts

...

Post by **Apoptosis** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 1:11 pm

dkarko wrote:So.. are they launching or what? . Weren't they supposed to release them in Tunisia a couple of days ago? (I'm kinda confused here hehehe).
I thought i could wait longer but this g965 crawls/sec of intel's is making me go nuts ...

No the launch is weeks and months away depending on which card you are talking about. The event in Tunisia was just a press event that always happens before a new core is released.

dkarko · Post by **dkarko** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 1:25 pm

I see! Thanks i was really confused. I would want something equivalent to 8800gts i guess. Or maybe something like hd26xx. Anyway, I'll hide the knives and wait

Legit Reviews

ATI DX10 R600 Pictures Have Been Leaked

Re: smoking!!!!!!!!!