Adaptec RAID 3805 8-port SATA and SAS Controller Review

A place to give your thoughts on our reviews!
Post Reply
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Adaptec RAID 3805 8-port SATA and SAS Controller Review

Post by Apoptosis »

The Adaptec RAID 3805 is an 8-port controller that supports SATA and SAS drives and next-generation PCIe connectivity. It features Adaptec RAID Code (ARC) with RAID levels 0, 1, 1E, 5, 5EE, 6, 10, 50, 60, JBOD and more! Read on to see how this MD2 low-profile RAID card does as we test it with 8 Western Digital Raptor hard drives in 11 RAID configurations on Linux!

Image
Raid10 can be a good compromise between raid5 and raid0 in terms of size. This configuration also allows you to have 1 and sometimes two drives fail and still maintain your volume. If you are like me and use your PC as a DVR, I have no real need for the extra speed. Raid5 is my choice because it gives me the most hard drive space while giving me at least one drive failure. If a drive does fail getting a next day air replacement from newegg will suffice. The odds that another drive will fail in those 24 hours are extremely low. If I want to be even more cautious, I can keep a hot spare in the array that could be merged into the array automatically.
Article Title: Adaptec RAID 3805 8-port SATA and SAS Controller Review
Article URL: http://www.legitreviews.com/article/508/1/
User avatar
bubba
Staff Writer
Staff Writer
Posts: 4765
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 10:24 am
Location: STL

Post by bubba »

Nice read. I'd think you would have to be real serious about data storage to have one of these in your home setup. Deep pockets wouldn't hurt either :mrgreen:
If there was a part two to this review, I would likely include tests of 7200rpm SATA drives which are bigger and cheaper.
Bet you could build one nice setup with 7200rpm SATA drives, but would it be worth it?
"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not."
-Thomas Jefferson
Sovereign
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 1045
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 5:28 pm

Post by Sovereign »

Cool. Now, if only I had a PCI-E ribbon extender... What I mean is something that extends the PCI-E slot out and is flexible. That's the only way to get any more expansion cards in my case due to dual 7900GTXs and an X-Fi consuming all available space.
Play
Q6600 @ 3.2GHz :: 8GB DDR2-800 :: eVGA 9800GX2 :: 7900GTX (secondary) :: abit IP35 Pro :: 150GB Raptor 10k RPM :: 2x750GB WD Caviar :: 120GB WD :: X-Fi XtremeMusic :: NEC 4551A :: BenQ DVD Combodrive (52x32x52) :: Dual 22" Acer AL2216W :: Thermaltake Armor Black :: Logitech Z5500 5.1

Work
Core 2 Duo @ 2.53GHz :: 4GB DDR3 @ 1067MHz :: 3670 :: Intel PM45 Chipset :: 500GB 5400RPM SATA :: Integrated Audio :: BD-ROM/DVD Burner :: 16" 1920x1080 RGBLED
atlr
Legit User
Legit User
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 12:15 pm

Post by atlr »

suggestion: add single drive to all tests for a performanance comparison with RAID
User avatar
DX
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 469
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 3:40 pm

Post by DX »

Damn nice review. I'm glad to see some thing like this.
dlang
Legit Little One
Legit Little One
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 1:22 am

please compare with software raid

Post by dlang »

in a configuration test like this, especially when running Linux, it would be good to have a few datapoints in the results showing how this card compares with the software option (you may also need to note the CPU utilization during the tests)

after all, is $500 really buying anything?

just one test with each raid type would be enough
Post Reply