
Article Title: Super Talent 2GB Exelerator Ready Boost Review
Article URL: http://legitreviews.com/article/543/1/
As i mentioned in the article I used games, sandra, everest, futuremark and more and couldn't notice or see a performance improvement. And resuming from a low power state took minutes thanks to the vista bug. If I can't play games or have more files open what's the point of ReadyBoost? Vista already has SuperFetch and the sort, so is ReadyBoost even a needed feature (if you call it a feature).Tech_Greek wrote:I don't think the point of ReadyBoost was for Futuremark Bench Marks...I believe it was meant for everyday use and in such grabbing files that are used a lot, etc and sticking them on the Flash RAM.
I've personally noticed a difference on my Alienware with it's 512MB DDR and my Desktop machine running 4GB of ram, Photoshop DEFINTLEY opens MUCH faster (CS3).
With $199 computers already coming with 7200RPM hard drives the question I have to ask is ReadyBoost already missed it's use? When Vista began on the drawing boards back in 2001/2002 this was a wise move, but now in 2007 with dual-core processors, memory reaching 10GB/Sec throughput on high end systems and 7200 RPM hard drives as a standard feature -- ReadyBoost doesn't sounds as good as it did back a few years ago. Just my thoughts...ReadyBoost, on the other hand, puts seeks to help out the slow hard drive by caching some data into USB 2.0 flash. By using a ReadyBoost-capable memory stick, you can take advantage of the near-instantaneous seek times on flash drives to get you your data quicker.
Nothing?Dragon_Cooler wrote:it certainly does what it is intended to do.
Regardless.Legit Bottom Line: With ReadyBoost not performing up to par and with fixes coming from Microsoft in SP1 it makes it impossible to suggest ReadyBoost to any of our readers regaurdless of the brand name. Stick to tried and true memory modules for improving system performance