Darkstar wrote:I didn't think the question was dumb, and i noticed it wasn't really answered...
I most certainly agree!
And just a friendly FYI...this is the "general computer forum", not the "reviews" forum. ... which is one of the reasons I remarked about this thread in the first place. It is difficult to discern what one is thinking when all we have is the written word, which is why I proceed with caution at all times. I'm not certain what your motives are, but I am confused by the "sexual preference" remark and the "Texas mentality" comment.
And yes, there has always been a standard of maturity at this site, which is why I choose it. Hope that clears things up on my end. Good Day!
Sir I bid you caution, no remarks directed at you thus far have been intended to cause offence or insult. While not a Mod/Admin myself, I'm sure they will echo my point and ask you to treat other members with a bit more respect. Further disregard to others will end up will only end up with you facing disciplinary action.
Thanks Dan I appreciate your response. I feel that ibleet and Dark star have embarked on a tag team bashing/crapping and flaming.
My comments were directed to you in response to your comments. In otherwords I was under the impression that we were communicating; further, Darkstar and ibleet were not included in the communication and in fact ibleet had been humorously rejected previously. If you disagree then please advise because my posts were not intended to solicit their response. Thank you, y
no offense y eye but it is a forum, people express their views. if you want to communicate with one person send a PM.
I fail to see how you can consider my post "flame/bashing/crapping" as nothing derogatory was said about you.
Thanks star for your response. I am not going to argue with you about anything. So if you consider the time and effort worth your while then I will try to explain. First, if you do consider further communication then be prepared for my opinion on crapping and flaming as possibly an afront, a critism of your first impressions and my interpretation of your image and psychological set. Secondly, I would ask that you explain how you came about and more importantly why you chose you statement without saying why you did not accept my comment. Your right to interfeer, which is what you did, whether or not it is justified, crapped the communication between me and Dan. Dan is capable of his own answer which is what I was soliciting. Now that communication is crapped. That is what I object to and again if you want to persue the issue then please feel free to say so. Thank you, y
I'm still here, but am somewhat off put on replying, not by the other peoples responses/questions, but by your treatment of other users with valid points.
I agree with everything the other people have said, and you have to remember that it is a public forum and that anyone is entitled to reply, and just because we may have engaged in a mini conversation others can still chip in with opinions etc.
What a joke. you have not responded to the topic of the thread, my thread only because I posted it, and the attempts to communicate on that subject. You are blinded by the flash of coolit and the girl from "WATCH THE VIDEO". I am not going to be redundant, because there is enough from you that is sufficient for judgement on that issue. I am still very interested and wait for someone to comment.... on the subject. It was humorous thanks for your comments. y
... which is one of the reasons I remarked about this thread in the first place. It is difficult to discern what one is thinking when all we have is the written word, which is why I proceed with caution at all times. I'm not certain what your motives are, but I am confused by the "sexual preference" remark and the "Texas mentality" comment.
