CPU-Z validation failed

Anything and everything software related that doesn't fit above can go in here!
Post Reply
User avatar
ibleet
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 1529
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 5:40 pm

CPU-Z validation failed

Post by ibleet »

In an attempt to validate my computer with CPU-Z 1.41, it fails.

Validation Failed for one or more of the following reasons:
- the support of this hardware is in beta version in the current version of CPU-Z.
- Your mainboard is known to have a BIOS with many cheats.
- Something goes wrong while validating the results.
THESE RESULTS MUST BE CONSIDERED FALSE.

CPU : AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (*1)
Freq : 2611.8 MHz (200.91 * 13)


Image

I especially like the part where my BIOS cheats. :lol: Anyone else have the same issue?
User avatar
Apoptosis
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 33941
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Contact:

Re: CPU-Z validation failed

Post by Apoptosis »

I have in the past, but it was on flaky boards to be honest and it was back in the CPU-Z 1.37 days.
User avatar
Major_A
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 3793
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 2:11 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: CPU-Z validation failed

Post by Major_A »

What do you mean cheats? Are you talking about the extra little performance it is giving you in Mhz? If so all boards have done this for a long time. I think they do this so when someone like Legit Reviews reviews the motherboard it may be a little faster than the competition.
User avatar
ibleet
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 1529
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 5:40 pm

Re: CPU-Z validation failed

Post by ibleet »

I have no clue what they mean by cheats...all it says is that my mainboard is known to have a BIOS with many cheats. I don't have anything overclocked and all my stats seem to be correctly reported. My core speed came up in RED font color, so maybe they thought that was a problem or a cheat. Strange considering my cpu runs at 2.6Ghz stock.

I tried the validation 3x now and I get this same message each time. None of my components are considered new and should all be supported by now. I doubt that my Asus Crosshair would be considered a flaky board. Oh well, no big deal.

Thanks for the replies. 8)
User avatar
Major_A
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 3793
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 2:11 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: CPU-Z validation failed

Post by Major_A »

Just curious but why is it so important to validate it? I mean you have a screenshot of what CPU-Z is showing.
User avatar
ibleet
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 1529
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 5:40 pm

Re: CPU-Z validation failed

Post by ibleet »

Major_A wrote:Just curious but why is it so important to validate it? I mean you have a screenshot of what CPU-Z is showing.
I did it to submit my results and compare them to other users with similar configurations. Besides that I get curious when things don't work as intended. Then I just need to know.

You don't need to validate to get the screenshot, that just gives you an ID number. Run cpu-z, select the tab you want a pic of, click print screen, open ms paint, edit paste.
User avatar
Major_A
Legit Extremist
Legit Extremist
Posts: 3793
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 2:11 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: CPU-Z validation failed

Post by Major_A »

I know how to take a SS. I was saying why do you need the validation if you already have a SS of what CPU-Z is reporting?
Post Reply