New Lightsmark 2007 OpenGL Benchmark

[Sparky]

System specs are in my signature. 8800GTS OC to 665/1005.

[FZ1]

Nice one Sparky! Read 'em and weep boys bwahahahahahaha Build is in sig...

555.8

[Sparky]

WOW! Awesome score FZ1!! Is that Q-Core working out well for you? Is it easier to OC than the earlier Q-Cores? I've been thinking about picking up a Quad to replace me E6700, but skeptical on the OC.

[FZ1]

This is the first Q core I have had but yes, the Penryns seem to OC easier.

[kenc51]

1

Lightsmark2.jpg (126.96 KiB) Viewed 143220 times

[kappage]

With my E1705 laptop in Sig...Windows XP MCE.

BAHAHHAHA finally i beat your laptop and it only took a new graphics card!!!, Note my rig is being bottlenecked by my really crappy cpu....

8600GTS.JPG (32.71 KiB) Viewed 143208 times

I was that i would beat your laptop

HOly ****!?!?!?!
555 that is a really nice score and a really nice pc.....

and this is at 3.00Ghz

at 3.00.JPG (91.33 KiB) Viewed 143200 times

Well when i started to clock it even furthur i got greedy at 3.1Ghz it went up by 3 more points and then at 3.2ghz it started to run then BSoD

[vicaphit]

Better than I expected. Had to run in widescreen though, 1280x1024 wasn't even an option.

[Zertz]

[DL126]

Vista 64

Vista64.jpg (190.71 KiB) Viewed 143088 times

XP 32

XP32.jpg (125.82 KiB) Viewed 143085 times

[KnightRid]

My new 8800GT and quad core Q6700 cpu running Vista 32 - now there were other programs running in the background and I dont think it would have been MUCH different if there werent, so I am figuring these are pretty close to what I should get - thought it would be higher

lightspeed1280X1024FS.jpg (35.64 KiB) Viewed 143062 times

lightspeed1680X1050FS.jpg (35.86 KiB) Viewed 143064 times

Thought there would be more difference between the 2 resolutions also.

Mike

I want to plug the 6bit drive in and test on there also - sometime soon hopefully ;)

Forgot - I ran it at 640X480 also

Windowed - 367.2fps
FullScreen - 372.3fps

thought they would be farther apart also

[Zertz]

This benchmark clearly does not require much CPU power, my little X2 performs with the quad cores

[DaIceMan]

too lazy for screenies from MS Paint... 233.2 at 1680x1050, 390.9 at 1280x1024 on the Behemoth with XP pro 32 and folding SMP at the same time.

[Methious]

Still in the middle of watering the gaming rig, Stock speed X2 6400 3.2GHZ cpu. XFX 8800GT Alpha Dog 625/900. After I get the case off it's side and closed I'll clock it up a little and see what I get.

[Methious]

Went ahead and clocked it some before I finish watering it. X2 6400 3.2 GHZ XFX 8800gt Aplha Dog 512 @ 699/980



Since I was making excuses for not finishing the rig I figured I better post it's condition at the time of the bench

[DaIceMan]

got another 30 or so frames out of it by running the test without folding running. I tried to tweak my video card a little and see what I could get but ATI Tool is freaking out and locking up every time I try to use it.

[DaIceMan]

video card at 630/1050, I got 455.5.

video card at 640/1060, I got 470.4.

[vicaphit]

All of these new people and nobody has added their benches? Come on people! free post! all you need is to run the benchmark and post a screenshot!

[ibleet]

Here is a new one from me...Specs in my Sig, windows XP MCE.



Didn't match FZ1, but not too shabby all the same.

[w00fd06]

oh thank god i beat the laptop, even if it was only a few more fps.

Lightsmark.JPG (47.84 KiB) Viewed 142826 times

well you get what you pay for, unfortunately, mid/low-end graphics card, mid/low end performance.

[vicaphit]

Up to 144 now, woohoo!