


http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=29323
exactly my thoughts on that.kenc51 wrote:Bunch of money grabbing bullies..........
I haven't bought a CD for myself in about 2years.....mainly because of nothing worth buying.....but now? I may just start downloading sh1t loads just in-spite of them
well check out "the fabulous life of..." on MTV or other music channels. these people make so much $$ they don't know how to spend it (or rather waste it). now if you consider that the artists make only the fracture of what the recording companies make, then you might get the picture how much they ripping us all off. now if the CD's would cost maybe $2-3 as they supposed to, then nobody would be downloading or piratingDeusEx wrote:dont u guys think they should just make all P2P sofware illegal, and prevent its distribution as well as use? wouldnt it make sense just to shut down limewire, kazaa, torrent, gokster etc... instead of prosecuting endless consumers ? isnt it about time the US gov used some common sense instead of petty politics and beuracracy getting in the way of necassary reforms ?
Mortious wrote: There really isn't any other non food product(s) sold today that holds that sort of power over the consumer like software/music/movies. And even with most food stuff, if you don't like it you can usually write the company for a refund of the purchase price.
Sadly, there's nowhere to legally download full quality lossless music, so I (and other people picky about quality) are stuck with purchased CDs as the only legal method of obtaining music.DeusEx wrote:u dont have to buy cds, u can pay 99 cents per song... downlaoding is illegal tho i wish it wasnt. My cousin got the dreaded letter saying if he dont stop downloadin, he going to hae to go to court. obviously he stopped and that was that. he gotl ucky i guess.
Except the RIAA only has influence in the US, and most of these programs originate in other countries.DeusEx wrote:dont u guys think they should just make all P2P sofware illegal, and prevent its distribution as well as use? wouldnt it make sense just to shut down limewire, kazaa, torrent, gokster etc... instead of prosecuting endless consumers ? isnt it about time the US gov used some common sense instead of petty politics and beuracracy getting in the way of necassary reforms ?
Piracy of a product is not proportional to its suckiness. Most pieces of software have trials available in order for people to try them before purchase. The vast majority of people who pirate music don't do it just to see if they like the artist; if they like the music, they'll keep it, otherwise, they'll delete it.Mortious wrote:Piracy will also continue to be an issue for as long as software publishers (and to some extent music producers) continue to release crap.
But this is an example of being socially engineered to believe that P2P software is illegal.DeusEx wrote:dont u guys think they should just make all P2P sofware illegal, and prevent its distribution as well as use? wouldnt it make sense just to shut down limewire, kazaa, torrent, gokster etc... instead of prosecuting endless consumers ? isnt it about time the US gov used some common sense instead of petty politics and beuracracy getting in the way of necassary reforms ?
Though I agree with you in part, most software does indeed have trials, as some or even most can attest here, those demo's often lack what the complete game will be or not be. In most cases newly released software often doesn't have a demo available prior to release date.Piracy of a product is not proportional to its suckiness. Most pieces of software have trials available in order for people to try them before purchase. The vast majority of people who pirate music don't do it just to see if they like the artist; if they like the music, they'll keep it, otherwise, they'll delete it.