
..... never thought of that, should try it.
I have read the information you have all the postings and it's funny that someone would make the above comment and yet has NO knowledge and apparently no understanding of what overclocking means. With that said, I truly wonder how many people even know what the heck they are talking about. Perhaps you all shouldn't check out the eBay user Digitalcrack and see the listings as well as the feedback. Oh wait, those buyers must be IDIOTS or are they just really more knowledgable ? Come to think about it, I wonder why Intel made a board that supported 2 separate cpu's ? Could it be for faster speed ?? Nah, they just wanted to rip people off. You people really need to get a clue as to what you're talking about before inserting your wothless wisdom. I'm sure that someone will pull this soon after it's posted, but that just shows what type of people this forum really has. Good day gentlemenRazorbacx wrote:What? You mean that you really can't do that?![]()
I foresee a class action lawsuit against Utopia Computers for false advertisement on the horizon.
Since this is about OC'ing, what speeds have you guys acheived using your best OC'ing methods? Just curious of what someone with the know how can actually get out of a processor.
Razorbacx
Chill out man! Also you don't make any sence........and no, we're not going to "pull this".urmamasucks wrote: I have read the information you have all the postings and it's funny that someone would make the above comment and yet has NO knowledge and apparently no understanding of what overclocking means. With that said, I truly wonder how many people even know what the heck they are talking about. Perhaps you all shouldn't check out the eBay user Digitalcrack and see the listings as well as the feedback. Oh wait, those buyers must be IDIOTS or are they just really more knowledgable ? Come to think about it, I wonder why Intel made a board that supported 2 separate cpu's ? Could it be for faster speed ?? Nah, they just wanted to rip people off. You people really need to get a clue as to what you're talking about before inserting your wothless wisdom. I'm sure that someone will pull this soon after it's posted, but that just shows what type of people this forum really has. Good day gentlemen
This forum has some of the best members on the net that pride themselves for being straight up and honest. When someone tries to put one over on those not in the know we like to point it out here... Sorry I don't see Intel selling 2.4GHz Quad-Core Kentsfield processors as 9.6Ghz processors (2.4GHz x 4 cores) or their Intel 805 Processors as 5.32GHz (really 2.66GHz)...urmamasucks wrote: I'm sure that someone will pull this soon after it's posted, but that just shows what type of people this forum really has. Good day gentlemen
2x cpu cores sharing 1 memory controller and other resources will never manage 200% performance compared to single core!urmamasucks wrote:Okay let me see if I can explain this and perhaps someone, MAYBE will understand. When you speak of quad pumping, you're referring to pumping 4 times( hmm on an INTEL ??) LOL..... the information or threads through a SINGLE CORE. So to better illustrate this lets try this. If you was on a 4 lane (quad) highway crossing a bridge and they all went down to 1 lane at the beginning of the bridge, the amount of traffic that crosses through is more than if it was just 1 single lane. Correct ?? Okay so far we are doing good. HENCE A SINGLE CORE CPU
Now on to the dual core with the same axample as above we have 2 SEPARATE CPU's mounted on the same die, hence 2 wide open lanes going across 2 separate bridges.....WOW, now I wonder how many more got across to the other side ?
What I believe that you people are thinking is that we or anyone else that sells them on eBay is that the speed of the cpu is running at 6.8 ghz. That's not what it means, it means that it can process the same amount of information as if it was a single core cpu, which doesn't exist, atleast not yet.
Another example, if you was filling 2 swimming pools, which one would fill faster ? The one with 1 hose (single core) or the one with 2 hoses (2 cores) ?
The sad thing is that very few if any games use the power of both cores but that's about to change.
I hope that this enlightens everyone a bit, atleast from where we stand. Comments are welcomed just not get into a rival argument.
[/b]
Apoptosis wrote:How would you feel if something like that happened to one of your family members?
Kentsfield is a quad-core processor. Meaning that it has four cores now lanes. Since you have no clue about Intel processors I suggest taking a look here to find out what Kentsfield is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Core ... chitectureurmamasucks wrote:Okay let me see if I can explain this and perhaps someone, MAYBE will understand. When you speak of quad pumping, you're referring to pumping 4 times( hmm on an INTEL ??) LOL..... the information or threads through a SINGLE CORE. So to better illustrate this lets try this. If you was on a 4 lane (quad) highway crossing a bridge and they all went down to 1 lane at the beginning of the bridge, the amount of traffic that crosses through is more than if it was just 1 single lane. Correct ?? Okay so far we are doing good. HENCE A SINGLE CORE CPU
Now on to the dual core with the same axample as above we have 2 SEPARATE CPU's mounted on the same die, hence 2 wide open lanes going across 2 separate bridges.....WOW, now I wonder how many more got across to the other side ?
What I believe that you people are thinking is that we or anyone else that sells them on eBay is that the speed of the cpu is running at 6.8 ghz. That's not what it means, it means that it can process the same amount of information as if it was a single core cpu, which doesn't exist, atleast not yet.
Another example, if you was filling 2 swimming pools, which one would fill faster ? The one with 1 hose (single core) or the one with 2 hoses (2 cores) ?
The sad thing is that very few if any games use the power of both cores but that's about to change.
I hope that this enlightens everyone a bit, atleast from where we stand. Comments are welcomed just not get into a rival argument.
[/b]
You're missing the point... You can't add the frequency of each core together! A 3GHz dual core processor shouldn't be sold at 6GHz.Kentsfield, quad-core MCM, consists of two Conroes, with 2 × 4 MiB L2 (8 MiB L2
The only way to effectively get 6.8GHz out of a 3.4GHz dual core is through core Multiplexing technology which is not yet available and may never be. (and it still won't be 100% effecient AND will only work on single threaded applications)urmamasucks wrote:Okay let me see if I can explain this and perhaps someone, MAYBE will understand. When you speak of quad pumping, you're referring to pumping 4 times( hmm on an INTEL ??) LOL..... the information or threads through a SINGLE CORE. So to better illustrate this lets try this. If you was on a 4 lane (quad) highway crossing a bridge and they all went down to 1 lane at the beginning of the bridge, the amount of traffic that crosses through is more than if it was just 1 single lane. Correct ?? Okay so far we are doing good. HENCE A SINGLE CORE CPU
Now on to the dual core with the same axample as above we have 2 SEPARATE CPU's mounted on the same die, hence 2 wide open lanes going across 2 separate bridges.....WOW, now I wonder how many more got across to the other side ?
What I believe that you people are thinking is that we or anyone else that sells them on eBay is that the speed of the cpu is running at 6.8 ghz. That's not what it means, it means that it can process the same amount of information as if it was a single core cpu, which doesn't exist, atleast not yet.
Another example, if you was filling 2 swimming pools, which one would fill faster ? The one with 1 hose (single core) or the one with 2 hoses (2 cores) ?
The sad thing is that very few if any games use the power of both cores but that's about to change.
I hope that this enlightens everyone a bit, atleast from where we stand. Comments are welcomed just not get into a rival argument.
[/b]